Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Nanobiomed Res. 2022 Jan 5;2(4):2100073. doi: 10.1002/anbr.202100073

Table 2:

Pore generation methods comparison.

Method Advantages Disadvantages
Gas foaming No use of chemical solvents,
Room temperature
Limited control over pore size and pore interconnectivity,
High pressure during the foaming step is not compatible for cell-laden scaffolds,
The foaming step might denature temperature sensitive materials
Particulate leaching Simple and low-cost facilities,
Room temperature,
Atmospheric pressure
Limited control over pore shape and pore interconnectivity,
The use of organic solvents is not compatible for cell-laden scaffolds,
Limited control over structure thickness and mechanical properties
Emulsification freeze-drying No use of solid porogens Small pore size and often irregular porosity,
The use of organic solvents is not compatible for cell-laden scaffolds,
Time-consuming