TABLE 5.
Bifactor graded response model parameters for the final DVMSQ model in Prolific and SPARK samples.
Prolific sample |
Spark sample |
||||||||||||||||||
a 1 | a 2 | a 3 | a 4 | a 5 | d 1 | d 2 | d 3 | d 4 | a 1 | a 2 | a 3 | a 4 | a 5 | d 1 | d 2 | d 3 | d 4 | ||
Item 1 | 1.96 | 1.09 | − | − | − | 5.69 | 3.46 | 0.49 | −2.35 | 1.60 | 0.77 | − | − | − | 6.03 | 4.48 | 2.06 | −0.01 | |
Item 2 | 5.15 | 5.83 | − | − | − | 6.03 | 0.41 | −5.70 | −11.90 | 4.32 | 5.36 | − | − | − | 7.38 | 3.59 | −2.27 | −6.93 | |
Item 4 | 0.82 | 0.55 | 0.66 | − | − | 1.46 | 0.56 | −0.98 | −2.66 | 1.00 | 0.64 | −0.07 | − | − | 1.82 | 0.78 | −0.53 | −1.97 | |
Item 5 | 2.85 | − | 2.17 | − | − | 2.09 | 0.07 | −2.44 | −5.61 | 2.34 | − | 1.00 | − | − | 4.06 | 2.80 | 1.10 | −0.90 | |
Item 6 | 2.07 | − | 0.97 | − | − | 2.80 | 1.16 | −0.92 | −2.76 | 2.41 | − | 1.84 | − | − | 6.74 | 5.23 | 2.64 | 0.45 | |
Item 7 | 1.78 | 1.37 | − | − | − | −0.16 | −1.85 | −3.48 | −5.18 | 1.55 | 1.40 | − | − | − | 1.16 | −0.29 | −2.01 | −3.39 | |
Item 8 | 2.24 | − | − | − | − | 0.65 | −0.68 | −2.43 | −4.55 | 1.70 | − | − | − | − | 2.61 | 1.29 | −0.29 | −1.73 | |
Item 9 | 2.47 | − | − | − | − | 3.75 | 1.98 | −0.34 | −2.75 | 2.27 | − | − | − | − | 6.25 | 4.59 | 1.91 | 0.03 | |
Item 10 | 1.32 | − | 0.30 | − | − | 0.18 | −0.47 | −1.60 | −2.91 | 1.31 | − | 0.11 | − | − | 1.73 | 1.34 | 0.28 | −0.94 | |
Item 12 | 1.29 | − | 0.30 | − | − | 1.39 | −0.10 | −1.75 | −3.49 | 1.25 | − | 0.25 | 0.49 | − | 3.54 | 2.21 | 0.41 | −1.20 | |
Item 13 | 2.53 | − | − | 2.59 | − | −1.67 | −4.96 | −7.52 | −9.60 | 2.44 | − | − | 3.25 | − | 2.68 | −0.80 | −4.67 | −7.70 | |
Item 14 | 1.38 | − | − | 1.70 | − | −0.79 | −2.80 | −4.61 | −6.52 | 1.43 | − | − | 2.42 | − | 0.91 | −1.00 | −3.13 | −5.14 | |
Item 15 | 2.12 | − | − | 2.67 | − | −2.75 | −4.92 | −7.26 | −8.83 | 1.69 | − | − | 2.25 | − | 0.75 | −1.39 | −3.67 | −6.04 | |
Item 16 | 1.79 | − | − | 2.73 | − | −3.36 | −5.24 | −6.92 | −8.87 | 1.25 | − | − | 1.98 | − | 0.04 | −0.98 | −2.40 | −3.73 | |
Item 18 | 3.52 | − | − | 2.87 | 1.98 | −0.13 | −4.35 | −7.66 | −10.69 | 3.00 | − | − | 2.55 | 1.99 | 5.51 | 1.26 | −2.82 | −6.30 | |
Item 19 | 5.33 | − | − | 4.28 | 3.52 | −0.18 | −6.89 | −11.19 | −15.65 | 3.57 | − | − | 2.82 | 2.74 | 7.31 | 1.83 | −2.52 | −7.34 | |
Item 20 | 3.35 | − | − | 2.78 | 1.84 | −2.67 | −6.17 | −8.19 | −10.46 | 2.56 | − | − | 1.90 | 1.83 | 2.85 | −0.30 | −3.43 | −5.77 |
Both models assume that all latent variables are orthogonal and have a standard normal distribution (i.e., M = 0, SD = 1) in the population. Differences in intercept terms between the two groups are not significant after considering the higher mean scores on the misophonia latent trait in the SPARK sample. a1–a5 = slope parameters (higher values indicate stronger relationships with the latent variables [i.e., stronger factor loadings]); d1–d4 = intercept parameters (higher values indicate “less difficult” or more easily endorsed item categories).