(
A) Shown is a schematic that indicates the genome editing strategy of introducing a myc-tag into the extracellular domain of sns, the fly nephrin. While myc is targeted to the border of exon 2, a marker (in reverse orientation) is inserted into the flanking intron. The marker expresses Dsred under control of the P3 promoter for identification of genome-edited flies, but is removable by flanking loxP sites. (
B–C’’) Shown are a tangential section (
B–B’’) and a cross section (
C–C’’) of a garland cell nephrocyte that carries Myc-tag in frame within the locus of fly nephrin, stained for Myc and Neph1 (Kirre). The Myc staining reveals a highly specific staining in a typical fingerprint-like pattern and colocalizes with endogenous fly Neph1. Nuclei are marked by Hoechst 33342 in blue here and throughout the figure. (
D–D’’) Silencing fly nephrin abrogates the specific signal from Myc-staining, confirming that the Myc staining indeed reflects endogenously expressed Myc-nephrin. (
E) Schematic drawing of the areas used for the quantitation in
Figures 2G and
5L (membrane = orange and subcortical area = blue). (
F–F’’) A nephrocyte after live antibody labeling and chase of 120 min in presence of bafilomycin (0.1 µM) is shown. This treatment causes a scattered, vesicular signal in the cytosol (
F) that partially colocalizes with total nephrin (
F–F’’), suggesting retention of the endocytosed antibody after blocking lysosomal degradation. (
G) Quantification of the results from (
F–F’’) compared to a control treatment without bafilomycin and shown as an intensity ratio of the cell interior vs. membrane (n=8–10 per genotype, p<0.01 for bafilomycin 0.1 µM).