Table 5.

Association between cooking frequency and sociodemographic characteristics modeled using a multinomial logistic regression (N = 2422).

	Cooked more vs cooked as much as usual		Cooked less vs cooked as much as usual		p-valueb
	Odds ratio	95% CIa	Odds ratio	95% CIa
Gender					0.02
Men	1		1
Women	1.29**	[1.07–1.54]	1.09	[0.78–1.54]
Age (years)					<0.001
18-24	1		1
25-34	0.81	[0.56–1.17]	0.74	[0.43–1.27]
35-49	0.80	[0.57–1.14]	0.35***	[0.20–0.61]
50-64	0.71*	[0.51–0.98]	0.21***	[0.12–0.38]
Over 65	0.41***	[0.28–0.59]	0.29***	[0.14–0.58]
Concerned for its diet					<0.001
No	1		1
Yes	1.88***	[1.54–2.29]	1.67**	[1.13–2.44]
Occupational situation during lockdown					<0.001
Work outside the home	1		1
Telecommuting	1.89***	[1.43–2.51]	1.93**	[1.17–3.29]
Reduced professional activity (interrupted work, partial unemployment)	1.68***	[1.29–2.18]	1.47	[0.92–2.36]
Other (unemployed, student, retiree)	0.98	[0.72–1.33]	0.62	[0.33–1.16]
Educational level					0.13
No high school diploma	1		1
High school diploma or more	1.16	[0.94–1.43]	0.81	[0.55–1.19]
Perceived financial situation					0.02
Good	1		1
Intermediate	0.94	[0.77–1.14]	1.24	[0.85–1.81]
Difficult	0.76*	[0.59–0.99]	1.61*	[1.02–2.52]
Size of place of residence					0.01
Less than 20,000 inhabitants	1		1
Between 20,000 and 100,000 inhabitants	1.27	[0.96–1.68]	1.39	[0.85–2.28]
More than 100,000 inhabitants and Paris area	1.41***	[1.16–1.71]	1.15	[0.79–1.66]
Presence of children in the household					0.005
No children	1		1
At least one child	1.47***	[1.16–1.84]	1.19	[0.79–1.79]

^a95% confidence interval.

^bp-value obtained using a Wald test.