Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 22;10:940294. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.940294

TABLE 2.

Clinical features of patients in CdLS-like cohort and those in NIPBL cohort.

Clinical feature NIPBL cohort (n = 34) KMT2A cohort (n = 6) ANKRD11 cohort (n = 14) EP300 cohort (n = 3) SETD5 cohort (n = 3) AFF4 cohort (n = 3) Remaining genes cohort (n = 17) Chi-square value P-valve
Synophrys 31 5 10 3 2 3 14 5.049 0.45
Thick eyebrows 17 3 11 0 1 2 2a 17.772 0.002
Short nose 19 2 0a 1 0 1 3a 19.015 0.001
Concave nasal ridge 23 4 5 0a 2 0a 5a 14.383 0.011
Upturned nasal tip 22 2 11 2 1 1 7 8.204 0.192
Smooth philtrum 15 3 5 1 2 0 2 8.899 0.139
Long philtrum 28 3 13 1 1 1 10 14.287 0.012
Downturned corners of mouth 18 3 5 1 1 1 7 2.354 0.924
Thin upper lip vermilion 27 4 7 2 2 0 10 10.158 0.08
Adactyly 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.945 0.754
Hand oligodactyly 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 2.420 0.944
Small hands 17 3 8 0 0 0 6 8.008 0.205
Small feet 8 0 5 1 0 0 3 4.438 0.594
Microcephaly 24 5 7 2 0 1 11 8.558 0.164
Global developmental delay and/or intellectual disability 28 6 13 3 3 2 17 6.197 0.294
Prenatal growth retardation 23 1a 1a 1 0a 0a 4a 23.496 0.000
Postnatal growth retardation 23 6 1a 3 1 1 10 24.140 0.000
Hypertrichosis 13 4 2 3 0 0 2 16.143 0.005
Short fifth finger 12 5 6 1 0 0 7 8.137 0.194
Average clinical score (mean ± SD) 12.23 ± 2.58 11 ± 2.19c 8.92 ± 1.77b 10 ± 4.58 7.33 ± 2.52b 5.33 ± 1.53bc 8.88 ± 2.62b < 0.0001

aIndicates that the incidence of phenotype was statistically significant compared with NIPBL cohort.

bIndicates that the average clinical score was statistically significant compared with NIPBL cohort.

cIndicates that the average clinical score of the two groups were statistically significant.