Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 19;57:101140. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101140

Table 2.

Performance of bad channel parameters tested on twenty files from an EGI dataset. The settings for each individual step are separated by a newline within the cell.

Bad Channel Parameters Accuracy
(780 Total Channels)
False Positive
(741 Good Channels)
False Negatives
(39 Bad Channels)
HAPPE 1.0 Legacy Detection 92.4% 41 18
Flatline = 5; Channel Corr = 0.1; Line Noise Ratio = 20
Spectrum = −5, 3.5
Channel Corr = 0.8; Line Noise Ratio = 6
97.6% 9 10
Flatline = 5; Channel Corr = 0.1; Line Noise Ratio = 20
Spectrum = −5, 3.5
Channel Corr = 0.75; Line Noise Ratio = 6
97.2% 7 15
Flatline = 5; Channel Corr = 0.1; Line Noise Ration = 20
Spectrum = −5, 3.5
Channel Corr = 0.8; Line Noise Ratio = 5
97.3% 11 10
Flatline = 5; Channel Corr = 0.1; Line Noise Ratio = 20
Spectrum = −4, 3.5
Channel Corr = 0.8, Line Noise Ratio = 6
97.2% 12 10
Flatline = 5; Channel Corr = 0.1; Line Noise Ratio = 20
Spectrum = −6, 3.5
Channel Corr = 0.8; Line Noise Ratio = 6
97.6% 9 10