TABLE 1.
Pumped AP circuit | Pumpless AP circuit | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter | Intervention | Intervention | |||||||||
Maintained on AP | Cannulated but not maintained on AP | Did not attempt to cannulate | Maintained on AP | Cannulated but not maintained on AP | Did not attempt to cannulate | ||||||
N | 13 | AP success rate per litter (%) | 19 | 57 | 12 | AP success rate per litter (%) | 56 | 9 | p-values: pumpless vs. pumped AP circuit (ANOVA results) | ||
62 | 28 | ||||||||||
Circuit type | Intervention | Interaction | |||||||||
Body weight (g) | 616 ± 139 (390–890) | 523 ± 145 (244–710)* | 557 ± 124 (372–941; n = 24)* | 743 ± 350 (500–1500; n = 7) ab | 644 ± 184 (343–1390; n = 52) a | 892 ± 362 (531–1470) b | <0.0001 | 0.002 | 0.02 | ||
GA (days) | 102 ± 4 (93–107) | 103 ± 4 (93–108) | 102 ± 5 (93–108) | 98 ± 4 (93–107) | 101 ± 7 (93–112) | 101 ± 7 (97–110) | 0.04 | 0.34 | 0.60 |
Two-way ANOVA. Multiple comparisons for fetal body weight and GA within pumped and pumpless AP circuits and between the intervention groups: ab p < 0.05. *p < 0.05 body weight is significantly different between pumped and pumpless AP circuits within intervention groups (i.e., body weight maintained on a pumped AP circuit vs. body weight maintained on a pumpless AP circuit). Interpretation of numbers for multiple comparisons: a represents a statistically significant difference compared with b.