Table 3.
Relationships between sample characteristics and attitudes towards increased alcohol prevention activities in the OHS
| Characteristic | Primary prevention | Secondary prevention | Tertiary prevention | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted | Adjusted | Unadjusted | Adjusted | Unadjusted | Adjusted | |
| ORa (95%CI)b | ORa (95%CI)b | ORa (95%CI)b | ORa (95%CI)b | ORa (95%CI)b | ORa (95%CI)b | |
| One-year increase in age | 1.00 (0.98–1.02) | - | 1.00 (0.97–1.02) | - | 0.99 (0.97–1.01) | - |
| Female gender | 1.73 (0.98–3.07) | 1.82* (1.01–3.28) | 1.11 (0.64–1.94) | - | 1.12 (0.65–1.93) | - |
| One-year increase in OHS experience | 1.02 (0.99–1.04) | 1.02 (1.00–1.05) | 1.00 (0.97–1.02) | - | 0.98 (0.96–1.01) | - |
| Professional groupc | 1.40 (0.90–2.18) | 1.29 (0.82–2.03) | 1.45 (0.92–2.29) | 1.45 (0.92–2.29) | 1.05 (0.68–1.63) | - |
| One-point increase in DNS score | 0.72 (0.41–1.25) | - | 0.72 (0.40–1.28) | - | 0.62 (0.35–1.08) | 0.62 (0.35–1.08) |
| Nagelkerke R2 | 3.3%* | 1.1% | 1.2% | |||
a Odds ratio from logistic regression
b 95% confidence intervals
c the reference category includes occupational therapist, occupational hygienist, nutritionist, physiotherapist, and ‘other’, while the second category includes physician, psychologist, and nurse
*p < 0.05