Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 6;23:757. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05603-3

Table 2.

Relationships between bone mass and cam morphology, determined by generalised estimating equations

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Exposure Outcome OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) p value
Max total hip BMD in g/cm2 Cam 1.12 (0.92–1.36) 0.25 1.09 (0.89–1.33) 0.40 0.88 (0.68–1.13) 0.31
L1 BMD in g/cm2 Cam 1.03 (0.84–1.25) 0.79 0.98 (0.80–1.20) 0.84 0.86 (0.67–1.09) 0.21
HBM status Cam 0.59 (0.41–0.86) 6.5 × 10–3 0.97 (0.63–1.51) 0.90 0.66 (0.38–1.13) 0.13

Model 1 = unadjusted; Model 2 = age and sex adjusted; Model 3 = adjusted for sex, age, weight, height and adolescent activity

Odds ratios are per SD increase in BMD or the odds in HBM individuals compared to non-HBM individuals

Abbreviations: HBM High bone mass, BMD Bone mineral density, OR Odds ratio, CI 95% confidence interval