Table 2.
Relationships between bone mass and cam morphology, determined by generalised estimating equations
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure | Outcome | OR (95% CI) | p value | OR (95% CI) | p value | OR (95% CI) | p value |
| Max total hip BMD in g/cm2 | Cam | 1.12 (0.92–1.36) | 0.25 | 1.09 (0.89–1.33) | 0.40 | 0.88 (0.68–1.13) | 0.31 |
| L1 BMD in g/cm2 | Cam | 1.03 (0.84–1.25) | 0.79 | 0.98 (0.80–1.20) | 0.84 | 0.86 (0.67–1.09) | 0.21 |
| HBM status | Cam | 0.59 (0.41–0.86) | 6.5 × 10–3 | 0.97 (0.63–1.51) | 0.90 | 0.66 (0.38–1.13) | 0.13 |
Model 1 = unadjusted; Model 2 = age and sex adjusted; Model 3 = adjusted for sex, age, weight, height and adolescent activity
Odds ratios are per SD increase in BMD or the odds in HBM individuals compared to non-HBM individuals
Abbreviations: HBM High bone mass, BMD Bone mineral density, OR Odds ratio, CI 95% confidence interval