Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 6;23:757. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05603-3

Table 5.

Relationship between cam and incident radiographic OA progression, determined by generalised estimating equations

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Exposure Outcome OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) p value
Cam Change in Osteophyte score 1.00 (0.67–1.49) 0.99 1.10 (0.79–1.65) 0.65 1.13 (0.70–1.80) 0.62
Cam Change in JSN score 1.00 (0.87–1.15) 0.99 0.99 (0.86–1.13) 0.87 1.00 (0.85–1.18) 0.99
Cam Incident OA 0.76 (0.16–3.49) 0.72 1.28 (0.26–6.37) 0.76 2.94 (0.61–14.27) 0.18
Cam Increase in Croft score 1.17 (0.32–4.27) 0.81 1.33 (0.34–5.14) 0.68 2.24 (0.48–10.47) 0.31

Incident OA: Any OA at follow-up in a hip with Croft < 3 at baseline

Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: age and sex adjusted; Model 3: adjusted for sex, age, weight and height, adolescent activity level and HBM status

Odds in hips with cam morphology compared to hips without cam morphology

Abbreviations: JSN Joint space narrowing, OA Osteoarthritis, OR Odds ratio, CI 95% confidence interval