Table 4.
Theme | Examples of students’ comments | No. of similar responses |
---|---|---|
Best features of FC | ||
The content of the discussion was more comprehensive and logical | Students prepared the presentation as required by the teacher, covering all aspects of content from basic knowledge, and experimental operations to experiment results. The discussion was more comprehensive and logical | 82/231 |
Pre-class learning requirements were clearer and students were better prepared | The teacher gave clear questions and presentation requirements before class, and most of the students were well prepared | 43/231 |
Group members undertook different pre-class preparation work with less pressure | Before class, students in the experiment operation group can choose to prepare different presentation contents, which reduces the learning pressure | 43/231 |
Most difficult features of FC | ||
The engagement of students in the presentation and discussion sessions was relatively low |
When one student was presenting, other students were preparing their own presentations, and the learning effect was not good Students rarely asked questions and no real group discussions occurred |
85/231 |
The preparation task before class was mostly memorization, which was not very helpful to the experiment | I felt like I spent a lot of time memorizing knowledge before class but still could not apply it well in the experiment | 59/231 |
The form of presentation and discussion is inflexible and cannot effectively stimulate interest in learning |
At the presentation and discussion session, I spent most of the time listening to other students or teachers. A little boring, and sometimes I couldn't concentrate The presentation and discussion session should be more flexible, allowing students to discuss freely |
40/231 |