Table 6b.
Comparisons of age, sex and work condition between poor and good sleepers.
Age (n = 1186) | Sex (female) (n = 1186) | Work condition |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Remote working (n = 1186) | Working in presence (n = 1186) | Not working (n = 1186) | Schedule-free (n = 1186) | |||
PSQI<5 | 39.69 ± 15.15 | 383 (56.7%) | 431 (63.8%) | 108 (16.0%) | 104 (15.4%) | 33 (4.9%) |
PSQI>5 | 39.49 ± 14.84 | 352 (69%) | 280 (54.9%) | 81 (15.9%) | 118 (23.1%) | 31 (6.1%) |
(df) p-value | 0.829 | (1) <0.001 | (1) 0.002 | (1) 1 | (1) <0.001 | (1) 0.439 |
PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
Chi-square's test was used to compare the distribution of sex and working condition, while for the other variables Mann-Whitney test was used for comparisons between poor and good sleepers.