Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 27;31(9):2717–2727. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03139-6

Table 5.

Comparison of anchors selected using expert rationale compared to selection according to highest area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve

EORTC QLQ-C30 scale Method SCNS-LF59 anchor Cut-Off Score AUC (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI)
Global quality of life Expert Feeling unwell a lot of the time + Not being able to do the things you used to do 71 0.78 (0.71–0.85) 0.78 (0.68–0.86) 0.69 (0.64–0.75)
AUC Changes to usual routine and lifestyle 71 0.76 (0.70–0.82) 0.74 (0.66–0.83) 0.72 (0.72–0.78)
Physical functioning Expert Physical and daily living needs 97 0.79 (0.73–0.85) 0.80 (0.71–0.89) 0.61 (0.54–0.67)
AUC Work around the home 90 0.82 (0.74–0.89) 0.79 (0.79–0.98) 0.75 (0.49–0.55)
Emotional functioning Expert Psychological needs 71 0.79 (0.74–0.84) 0.71 (0.64–0.79) 0.70 (0.64–0.77)
AUC Feelings of sadness 79 0.85 (0.81–0.90) 0.88 (0.82–0.93) 0.63 (0.55–0.70)
Social functioning Expert Changes to usual routine and lifestyle + Changes in other peoples attitudes towards you 92 0.81 (0.75–0.86) 0.82 (0.75–0.90) 0.70 (0.64–0.77)
AUC Changes to usual routine and lifestyle 92 0.84 (0.79–0.88) 0.86 (0.79–0.93) 0.71 (0.65–0.77)

EORTC QLQ-C30 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, SCNS-LF59 supportive care needs survey long form 59, AUC area under the ROC curve, CI confidence interval