Table 2.
Good clinical practice inspection findings by deficiency areas included in data analysis
Deficiency area | Deficiency sub-areas |
---|---|
Protocol compliance# | Eligibility criteria |
Assessment of efficacy | |
Safety reporting | |
Reporting in case report form/diary as specified in the protocol | |
Other protocol non-compliance not listed above | |
Trial management* | Data management |
Monitoring | |
Document control | |
Audit | |
Documentation# | Essential documents |
Source documentation | |
Qualification and training | |
Standard operating procedures | |
Organization and personnel | |
Facilities and equipment | |
Randomization, blinding and codes of study drug | |
Direct access to data | |
Contracts and agreements | |
Study drug# | Drug accountability |
Supplying, storage, retrieving and destruction | |
Prescription, administration and compliance | |
Human subject protection#,* |
Informed consent • Presence of informed consent in the site • Informed consent process • Informed consent form content |
Independent ethics committee/institutional review board • Favorable opinion in the site • Opinion, amendments and notifications to the Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board • Composition, functions and operation | |
Subject protection • Personal data protection • Safeguard of the safety and well-being of subject |
*The findings in Trial Management were only included in the sponsor/contract research organization inspection analysis because it is the responsibility of sponsor or contract research organization. The findings in Human Subject Protection were only included in the clinical investigator inspection analysis because it is the responsibility of clinical investigator, according to the FDA regulations
#Name modifications from EMA good clinical practice finding categories:
“Protocol Compliance” = “Investigational Site”
“Documentation” = “General”
“Study Drug” = “Investigational Medicinal Products”
“Human Subject Protection” = “Informed Consent” + “Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board” + “Subject Protection”