Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 6;13:4588. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32383-0

Fig. 5. Combining CPM and the Neurosynth results.

Fig. 5

The Neurosynth meta-analytic results for (a) inhibiting, (b) updating, (c) shifting tasks, and (d) their conjunctions, based on the common activation map for all three tasks. e The updating-specific meta-analytic map was obtained by subtracting the common map from the updating-task map. f The shifting-specific meta-analytic map was obtained by subtracting the common map from the shifting-task map. g Overlap with the CPM result. The specific brain regions for the common EF component were obtained by overlapping the top ten nodes for the common EF component in the CPM analysis with the conjunction map (d), whereas those for the shifting-specific component were obtained by overlapping the top ten nodes for the shifting-specific component in the CPM analysis with the shifting-specific meta-analytic map (f). The brain figure was visualized by the BrainNet Viewer123 under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). MFG   middle frontal gyrus, LOC   lateral occipital cortex. Here, we only show the clusters with over 100 voxels.