Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Paediatr Anaesth. 2022 Jun 24;32(9):1015–1023. doi: 10.1111/pan.14505

Table 5.

Technical Challenges Encountered and Procedure-related Feedback as Reported by Supervisors Post-Implementation

Supervisor Reported Challenges Tracheal Intubations (N=248)
Direct laryngoscopy (N=60) Video laryngoscopy (N=188) P-value
Technical Challenges
Difficulty with neck flexion/extension 6 (10%) 14 (7%) 0.59
Difficulty with laryngoscope insertion 2 (3%) 10 (5%) 0.74
Difficulty lifting laryngoscope without rocking 2 (3%) 11 (6%) 0.74
Difficulty handling tongue 3 (5%) 10 (5%) 1
Difficulty handling epiglottis 2 (3%) 17 (9%) 0.175
Difficulty with communication 0 (0%) 2 (1%) 1
Other challengesa 9 (15%) 16 (9%) 0.15
Procedure-Related Feedback Provided
Optimize patient positioning 4 (7%) 20 (10%) 0.46
Optimize body mechanics 2 (3%) 4 (2%) 0.63
Optimize patient physiology 2 (3%) 2 (1%) 0.25
Different equipment choice 1 (2%) 7 (4%) 0.68
Different equipment preparation 2 (3%) 9 (5%) 1
Improved communication 2 (3%) 4 (2%) 0.64
Crowd control 2 (3%) 1 (1%) 0.15
Better role assignment 0 (0%) 1 (1%) 1
Better understanding of anatomy 3 (5%) 15 (8%) 0.57
Different laryngoscopy handling 6 (10%) 24 (13%) 0.66
Other suggestionsb 4 (7%) 11 (6%) 0.76
a

Other challenges included: Tube styletting, CPR ongoing, pulmonary hemorrhage, C-spine precautions

b

Other suggestions included: Techniques for dealing with secretions, tube handling