Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 27;113(8):2862–2877. doi: 10.1111/cas.15440

TABLE 1.

Association between ZEBRA status and clinicopathological parameters in 64 nasopharyngeal carcinomas

Value ZEBRA status
Positive (n = 32) Negative (n = 32) p‐Value
Age (years ± SD) * 58.2 ± 13.6 59.0 ± 13.7 0.81
Sex (%)
Male 28 (88) 26 (81) 0.73
Female 4 (12) 6 (19)
Smoking (%)
Never 9 (28) 14 (43) 0.30
Past and present 23 (72) 18 (57)
Alcohol (%)
Never 20 (63) 17 (53) 0.61
Past and present 12 (37) 15 (47)
T (%)
1–2 18 (56) 15 (47) 0.78
3–4 14 (44) 17 (53)
N (%)
0–1 14 (44) 18 (56) 0.32
2–3 18 (56) 14 (44)
M (%)
0 30 (94) 30 (94) 1
1 2 (6) 2 (6)
Stage (%)
I–II 7 (22) 8 (25) 0.86
III–IV 25 (78) 24 (75)
WHO classification (%)
2 20 (63) 22 (69) 0.79
3 12 (37) 10 (31)
Treatment (%)
CRT 28 (88) 30 (94) 0.67
RT 3 (9) 2 (6)
Chemotherapy 1 (3) 0 (0)
ERα (%)
Negative 3 (9) 27 (84) <1 × 10 −8
Positive 29 (91) 5 (16)
Aromatase (%)
Negative 10 (31) 23 (72) <0.01
Positive 22 (69) 9 (28)

Note: The ZEBRA, ER⍺, and aromatase status was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and the cutoff values were 15%, 10%, and 20%, respectively, determined from the median value of IHC of each positivity. All other values represent the number of cases and were evaluated cross‐table using the chi‐squared test. A p‐value <0.05 is considered significant and shown in boldface.

Abbreviations: CRT, chemoradiotherapy; ERα, estrogen receptor α; RT, radiotherapy; SD, standard deviation.

*

Data are presented as mean and SD and were evaluated by t‐test.