Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 31;2022:7603062. doi: 10.1155/2022/7603062

Table 3.

Prevalence of IgA, IgG, and IgM antibodies to enteroviruses (EV) in the study population by the different age groups.

Age groups Control T1D p value All
n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI) n % (95% CI)
IgA EV antibodies
0–18.9 y 5/36 13.9 (5.2–30.3) 16/36 44.4 (28.3–61.7) 0.0098 21/72 29.2 (19.3–41.2)
19–35.9 y 2/26 7.7 (1.3–26.6) 13/26 50.0 (32.1–67.9) 0.0055 15/52 28.8 (17.5–43.3)
IgG EV antibodies
0–18.9 y 18/36 50.0 (34.5–65.5) 15/36 41.7 (26.0–59.1) NS 33/72 45.8 (34.1–57.9)
19–35.9 y 11/26 42.3 (24.0–62.8) 15/26 57.7 (37.2–76.0) NS 26/52 50.0 (36.9–63.1)
IgM EV antibodies
0–18.9 y 1/36 2.8 (0.1–16.2) 2/36 5.6 (9.7–20.0) NS 3/72 4.2 (1.1–12.5)
19–35.9 y 0/26 1/26 3.8 (0.2–21.6) NS 1/52 1.9 (0.1–11.6)

Data are presented as the number of EV antibody-positive persons and percentage with the 95% confidence interval (CI) in a row. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, matched for gender, age, and HLA-DR/DQ genotype risk groups for type 1 diabetes (T1D). p values ≤ 0.05 are in bold. NS: not significant.