Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 8;30(2):2813–2835. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22320-5

Table 6.

Systematic GMM estimation results for the impact of digital finance on energy efficiency

Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
L.EFF 0.681*** (13.342) 0.668*** (12.763) 0.655*** (13.168) 0.680*** (12.297) 0.662*** (9.215)
DIF 0.966*** (4.409)
DIF2  − 1.902*** (− 4.043)
COV 0.903*** − 3.16
COV2  − 1.963*** (− 2.945)
DIGI 1.130** − 2.321
DIGI2  − 1.763** (− 2.136)
INSU 0.814*** − 2.859
INSU2  − 0.780*** (− 2.713)
CRE 4.026** (2.405)
CRE2  − 13.103** (− 2.341)
tec  − 0.300*** (− 5.481)  − 0.301*** (− 5.330)  − 0.272*** (− 5.098)  − 0.245*** (− 3.734)  − 0.387*** (− 4.421)
struct 106.700** (2.482) 104.401** (2.402) 122.425*** (3.048) 145.689*** (3.28) 155.822*** (3.177)
eco 0.5 (0.003) 55.439 (0.272) 55.828 (0.283) 225.778 (0.967) 350.066 (1.13)
energy  − 12.991 (− 1.627)  − 11.909 (− 1.443)  − 9.553 (− 1.244)  − 9.298 (− 1.173)  − 1.781 (− 0.168)
Constant term  − 0.055 (− 0.553)  − 0.025 (− 0.249)  − 0.137 (− 1.239)  − 0.252* (− 1.712)  − 0.352 (− 1.881)
AR(1) 3.623*** 3.552***  − 3.651***  − 3.477*** 3.662***
AR(2)  − 1.636  − 1.444 1.121 1.263  − 1.069
Hansen J test p = 0.356 p = 0.192 p = 0.267 p = 0.651 p = 0.100

Values in parentheses are t-values. The values in AR(1) and AR(2) are z-values

*Significant at the 10% level; ** significant at the 5% level; *** significant at the 1% levels