Table 6.
Subgroup analysis of included randomized controlled trials for the effect of CoQ10 supplementation on HOMA-IR.
| Group | No. of trials (participates) | WMD (95% CI) | Pdifferencea | I2, % | Pheterogeneityb | Pc for between subgroup heterogeneity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 18 (988) | −0.69(−1.00, −0.38) | <0.001 | 88.80 | <0.001 | |
| Study design | ||||||
| Parallel | 18 (988) | −0.69(−1.00, −0.38) | <0.001 | 88.80 | <0.001 | |
| Duration (week) | ||||||
| <12 | 8 (374) | −0.24(−0.52, 0.05) | 0.11 | 79.45 | 0.00 | <0.001 |
| ≥12 | 10 (614) | −1.03(−1.40, −0.65) | <0.001 | 61.13 | 0.01 | |
| CoQ10 dosage | ||||||
| <200 mg/day | 10 (597) | −0.97(−1.44, −0.50) | <0.001 | 80.99 | <0.001 | 0.10 |
| ≥200 mg/day and <300 mg/day | 7 (356) | −0.54(−1.17, 0.10) | 0.10 | 93.79 | <0.001 | |
| ≥300 mg/day | 1 (35) | −0.20(−0.72, 0.32) | 0.45 | - | - | |
| Control group | ||||||
| Placebo | 16 (907) | −0.76 (−1.13, −0.39) | <0.001 | 89.72 | <0.001 | 0.53 |
| Other | 2 (81) | −0.47 (−1.31, 0.36) | 0.27 | 82.16 | 0.02 | |
| Quality of study | ||||||
| High | 1 (40) | −1.38 (−3.60, 0.84) | 0.22 | - | - | 0.54 |
| Low | 17 (948) | −0.68 (−1.00, −0.37) | <0.001 | 89.38 | <0.001 | |
| Received industry funding? | ||||||
| Yes | 5 (234) | 0.03(−0.33, 0.40) | 0.86 | 63.99 | 0.03 | <0.001 |
| No | 13 (754) | −0.99(−1.42, −0.55) | <0.001 | 90.72 | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: WMD, weighted mean difference; CI, confidence interval; CoQ10, coenzyme Q10.
Dersimonian–Laird random effect model was used to calculate the effect size and P-value.
Cochrane Q test was used to detect the heterogeneity between studies.
Cochrane Q test was used to detect the subgroup heterogeneity.