Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 7;8(8):e09904. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09904

Table 16.

Interaction effect model estimation results.

Explained variable: EI (GMM) (1) (2) (3) (4)
L.EI 0.8528∗∗∗ 0.8564∗∗∗ 0.8721∗∗∗ 0.8765∗∗∗
[0.0010] [0.0009] [0.0008] [0.0006]
cyjg -0.0688∗∗∗ -0.0520∗∗∗ -0.0898∗∗∗ -0.0469∗∗∗
[0.0049] [0.0024] [0.0030] [0.0014]
FD -0.1391∗∗∗
[0.0030]
cyjg×FD -0.2260∗∗∗
[0.0287]
FI -0.1079∗∗∗
[0.0028]
cyjg×FI -0.0843∗∗∗
[0.0169]
FM -0.0750∗∗∗
[0.0031]
cyjg×FM -0.2935∗∗∗
[0.0236]
dctps -0.0357∗∗∗
[0.0006]
cyjg×dctps -0.0795∗∗∗
[0.0096]
_cons 0.0549∗∗∗ 0.0499∗∗∗ 0.0513∗∗∗ 0.0315∗∗∗
[0.0019] [0.0011] [0.0010] [0.0004]
Control variables YES YES YES YES
Observations 1369 1369 1369 1349
NO of country 67 67 67 67
NO of IVs 73 73 73 73
AR (2) test (p-value) 0.4552 0.4487 0.4748 0.3613
Sargan test (p-value) 0.4452 0.4320 0.3812 0.4306

Standard errors in brackets, ∗∗∗ 1% ∗∗ 5% ∗ 10%, ∗p < 0.1, ∗∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.01.