Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 5;13:20406223221109655. doi: 10.1177/20406223221109655

Table 2.

Results of prolonged weaning – comparison of patients with unsuccessful and successful decannulation.

Results of prolonged weaning All patients (n = 532) Decannulation failure (n = 216) Decannulation success (n = 316) p value a
Weaning completion to decannulation (days) 5 (3–11) 5 (3–11)
Decannulation to discharge (days) 13 (8–21) 13 (8–21)
Secondary decannulation failures 30 (5.6) 30 (13.9)
 Decannulation to re-cannulation (days) 2 (1–4) 2 (1–4)
Weaning success 311 (58.5) 91 (42.1) 220 (69.6) < 0.01 b
Weaning failure 221 (41.5) 125 (57.9) 96 (30.4) < 0.01 b
 Home mechanical ventilation – NIV 96 (18.0) 96 (30.4)
 Home mechanical ventilation – IMV 125 (23.5) 125 (57.9)
Duration of mechanical ventilation (days)* 44 (32–57) 47 (33–66) 41 (31–54) <0.01 c
PEG feeding tube placement 280 (52.6) 165 (76.4) 115 (36.4) <0.01 b
NPO recommendation on discharge 198 (37.2) 152 (70.4) 46 (14.6) <0.01 b

IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; NIV, non-invasive mechanical ventilation; NPO, nil per os; PEG, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Continuous variables are presented as median (– interquartile range [IQR]); categorical variables are presented as numbers (%).

a

p value for differences between patients with unsuccessful and successful decannulation. Significant values are in bold.

b

Chi-square test.

c

Mann–Whitney U-test.

*

Time spent on invasive ventilation, defined as the period between intubation and prolonged ventilator weaning completion.