Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 22;8(4):510–524. doi: 10.1002/osp4.589

TABLE 1.

Description of clinical trial studies

Author (Country) Study design Sample % (completed) Patients included Intervention Clinical outcomes Weight loss outcomes Liver disease outcomes Safety
Lin 2009 (Taiwan) Randomized open‐label, parallel trial 95 (72%) Obesity, NAFLD Randomized 12 weeks of 450 or 800 kcal/day Change in body weight, body composition, waist circumference, lipids, liver ultrasound Average weight loss of 9.2% and 8.9% in 450 kcal/day and 800 kcal/day, respectively 16% of participants with NAFLD on ultrasound returned to normal by 12 weeks 103 adverse events (60 may be treatment related); no serious adverse events
Contreras 2018 (Spain) Randomized open‐label, parallel trial 84 (98%) Obesity, LAGB candidates, NAFLD Randomized to 21 days of 800 kcal/day of meal replacement versus 1200 kcal diet prior to bariatric surgery Body weight change, body composition, liver volume, surgical complications Weight loss of 5.8% in VLCD compared to 4.2% in LCD Liver volume reduced by 15.6% ± 11.2% in VLCD and 12.3% ± 10.6% in LCD (not significant) More participants in VLCD had dizziness (39.5% vs. 12%) and weakness (37.2% vs. 21%) than LCD
Chong 2020 (New Zealand) Randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial 56 (93.3%) NAFLD 4 weeks of 600 kcal/day, then randomized into three groups (MI, PI, PP) for 12 weeks Maintaining ≥7% weight loss at 16 weeks, changes in ALT, glycemia, lipids, elastography, gut microbiome Maintenance of ≥7% weight loss was 55%, 53%, and 35% for the MI, PI, and PP groups, respectively MI group had a significant reduction in ALT of 19.6 U/L No adverse events
Baldry 2016 (UK) Randomized open‐label, parallel trial 54 (90%) Bariatric surgery candidates, NAFLD Randomized 2 weeks of 800 kcal/day (food‐based or meal replacement shake) Liver biopsy histological assessment at end of diet, weight loss, inflammatory markers, and difficulty of surgery Weight loss of 3.6% in the food group and 3.4% in the meal replacement groups (not significant) 50% of food group and 64% in the meal replacement group had steatosis (not significant) 1 adverse event and 1 serious adverse event likely unrelated to intervention
Cunha 2020 (Brazil) Randomized open‐label, parallel trial 39 (84.8%) Obesity, NAFLD Randomized to 2 months of either low carbohydrate (<50 g) 600–800 kcal/day diet or diet with 15% deficit (1400–1800 kcal/day) Body weight change, abdominal MRI to measure visceral adipose tissue area and liver PDFF, elastography for liver stiffness Average weight loss of 9.6% ± 2.9% in the VLCKD and 1.9% ± 2.4% in the lower calorie group Liver PDFF mean reduced 38.5% on VLCKD. Liver steatosis (PDFF>5.4%) decreased from 70% to 30% in the VLCKD group No adverse events

Abbreviations: ALT, alanine transaminase; LAGB, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding; LCD, low calorie diet; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; MI, metronidazole/inulin, PI, placebo/inulin, PP, placebo/placebo; PDFF, proton density fat fraction; VLCD, very low calorie diet; VLCKD, very low calorie ketogenic diet.