Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Aerosol Sci. 2021 May;154:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105734

Table 4. Intersystem comparison of number EI.

Linear fit results for AEDC APC nvPM number EIs vs. the APC nvPM number EIs in the second sampling system as shown in Panels A and B of Fig. 2. All squared correlation coefficient (r2) values are > 0.96.

Y-axis Sampling System (APC)a VARIAnT Campaign Source Slope Slope Standard Error Intercept (particles/kg fuel) Intercept Standard Error (particles/kg fuel)
PW 1 J85 1.11 0.01 9.8E+12 1.9E+13
PW 1 CAST 0.95 0.02 3.3E+13 9.3E+12
MST 2 J85 1.00 0.03 2.5E+12 3.3E+13
MST 2 CAST 0.74 0.04 4.2E+12 1.2E+13
a

PW = Pratt Whitney; MST = Missouri University of Science and Technology.