Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 25;13:872544. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872544

Table 2.

Methodological information arranged per author.

Reference Methods Sample size Sample age
Hickman et al. (2021) Cross sectional survey n = 10 000 16–25 years old
Chalupka et al. (2020) General review (no specific method) None mentioned “Children”
Pinto and Grove-White (2020) Observational One primary school (sample size not further specified) Primary school aged children (5–12 years old)
Plautz (2020) Newspaper article None mentioned 12–25 years old
Ratinen and Uusiautti (2020) Cross-sectional survey (descriptive design) 950 11–17 years old (M = 13.6)
Taylor and Murray (2020) Newspaper article None mentioned “Children” and “Youth”
Zummo et al. (2020) Qualitative analysis of letters n = 350 12–18 years old
Li and Monroe (2019) Cross-sectional survey (descriptive design) n = 728 13–18 years old (9–12th graders)
Burke et al. (2018) General review (no specific method) None mentioned “Children”
Boggs et al. (2016). General review (no specific method) None mentioned “Children”
Stevenson and Peterson (2016) Cross-sectional survey (descriptive design) n = 1486 11–15 years old
Ojala (2013) Cross-sectional survey (descriptive design) n = 321 M = 17.2 years old
Ojala (2012a) Cross-sectional survey (descriptive design) Late childhood (n = 90)
Adolescents (n = 146)
Late childhood (M = 11.7 years old) Adolescents (M = 16.4 years old)
Ojala (2012b) Cross-sectional survey (descriptive design) n = 293 12 years old
Strife (2012) Semi-structured qualitative interviews n = 50 10–12 years old
Sobel (2007) General review (no specific method) None mentioned “Children”
Nagel (2005) Phenomenological interviews n = 40 7th grade (12–13 years old)
Huang and Yore (2005) Cross-sectional survey (descriptive design) n = 761 5th grade (10–11 years old)