Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 9.
Published in final edited form as: Trans ASABE. 2021;64(2):691–704. doi: 10.13031/trans.14017

Table 2.

Results of cost-effectiveness analysis for corn-soybean with respect to the conventional baseline (continuous corn). Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of studies that directly compared the cropping systems listed.

Cropping System Definition Net Revenue ($ ha−1 year−1) Mean Subsurface NO3 Load (kg N ha−1 year−1) Percent NO3 Load Reduction (%) Cost Benefit of NO3 Load Reduction ($ kg N−1)
CC Continuous corn 81.74 22.0 (7) - -
CS Corn-soybean 141.83 9.91 (7) 32.7 5