Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 8;17(8):e0271636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271636

Table 2. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance and subjective feedback (NRS) in three groups.

2FT 2TT CTT P-value
(n = 31) (n = 31) (n = 31)
CPR performance Compression depth (mm) 40 (39–41) a 42 (41–43)b 42 (41–43)b <0.05
Compression rate (bpm) 106 (104–112) 109 (105–114) 107 (103–114) 0.667
Chest recoil (%) 100 (99–100) 99 (95–100) 99 (92–100) 0.057
Adequate ventilation (%) 56 (38–80) 50 (20–70) 63 (38–78) 0.260
Total simulation time (sec) 116.0 (109–122)a 119 (114–123)a 122 (118–128)b <0.05
Hands-off time per cycle (sec) 6 (6–6)a 7 (6–8)b 7 (6–8)b <0.05
Chest compression fraction (%) 73.9 (72.2–75.6)a 71.2 (67.2–72.2)b 71.3 (67.7–74.1)b <0.05
Correct location (%) 99 (86–97) 100 (97–100) 100 (99–100) 0.058
Questionnaires Difficulty level 3 (1–5) 3 (2–6) 2 (2–4) 0.554
Fatigue 7 (6–8) a 5 (3–7) b 4 (2–6) b <0.05
Pain 7 (6–8) a 5 (3–6) b 5 (3–6) b <0.05

The different letters indicate significantly different groups on the basis of the Kruskal-Wallis test with multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni correction method. Data show as median (interquartile range).

2FT, Two finger technique; 2TT, Two thumb encircling technique; CTT, Cross thumb technique; CPR, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; bpm, Beat per minutes; NRS, Numeric rating scale.