Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul;11(7):1479–1496. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-22-444

Table 3. Identification of the gene expression signature by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

No. Gene Univariate analysis* Multivariate analysis**
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
1 GPX3 0.7399 0.6117–0.895 0.0019 0.6238 0.4789–0.8125 0.0005
2 PTPRM 1.3738 1.1002–1.7154 0.0051
3 ASPM 1.2755 1.0745–1.514 0.0054
4 CENPF 1.2543 1.0607–1.4833 0.0081
5 TK1 1.3054 1.0733–1.5878 0.0076
6 PRR36 0.7927 0.6663–0.9431 0.0088
7 PLEK2 1.3833 1.1464–1.6691 0.0007 1.3876 1.0767–1.7883 0.0114
8 SLC2A1 1.2589 1.0766–1.4721 0.0039
9 FAM83A 1.2135 1.0796–1.3639 0.0012
10 MIF 1.4026 1.1054–1.7797 0.0054
11 PRC1 1.3344 1.0801–1.6486 0.0075
12 GJB2 1.1823 1.0597–1.319 0.0027
13 HMMR 1.3209 1.105–1.579 0.0022
14 ANLN 1.3082 1.1129–1.5377 0.0011
15 KCNK5 0.7836 0.6821–0.9003 0.0006
16 COL1A1 1.1987 1.0522–1.3655 0.0064 1.2173 1.02–1.4528 0.0293

*, the 16 DEGs were significantly associated with OS (P<0.01) according to univariate Cox regression analysis; **, we then performed multivariate Cox regression analysis on these 16 DEGs to identify the most informative gene set for survival prediction. Finally, the three genes marked in grey in the table were selected for multivariate Cox regression analysis and generation of a prognostic risk model according to their respective regression coefficients. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; DEGs, differentially-expressed genes; OS, overall survival.