Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 8;12:320. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02069-8

Table 3.

Statistics for microarray and qRT-PCR analyses.

Gene Two-way ANOVA results Post hoc comparison (Tukey’s test) results (p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001)
Gadd45b (M, microarray) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 12) = 18.39, p = 0.0011 WT vs WT ECS ***, WT ECS vs KO ECS ***
Gadd45b (M, qRT PCR) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 12) = 12.55, p = 0.0041 WT vs WT ECS ***, WT ECS vs KO ECS **
Gadd45b (F, qRT PCR)

Sig effect of genotype F (1, 14) = 5.302, p = 0.0372;

Sig effect of treatment F (1, 14) = 15.80, p = 0.0014

WT vs WT ECS **, WT ECS vs KO ECS *
Gadd45g (M, microarray) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 12) = 18.39, p = 0.0011 WT vs WT ECS ***, WT ECS vs KO ECS **
Gadd45g (M, qRT PCR) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 12) = 9.875, p = 0.0085 WT vs WT ECS ***, WT ECS vs KO ECS *
Gadd45g (F, qRT PCR) Not sig N/A
Cdnk1a (M, microarray) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 12) = 7.316, p = 0.0191 WT vs WT ECS ****, KO vs KO ECS *, WT ECS vs KO ECS *
Cenpa (M, microarray) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 12) = 263.1, p < 0.0001 WT vs WT ECS ****, WT ECS vs KO ECS ****
Cenpa (M, qRT PCR) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 12) = 103.9, p < 0.0001 WT vs WT ECS ****, WT ECS vs KO ECS ****
Cenpa (F, qRT PCR) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 14) = 68.28, p < 0.0001 WT vs WT ECS ****, WT ECS vs KO ECS ****
Fos (M, microarray) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 12) = 10.92, p = 0.0063 WT vs WT ECS ****, KO vs KO ECS *, WT ECS vs KO ECS**
Fos (M, qRT PCR) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 12) = 5.808, p = 0.0329 WT vs WT ECS **, WT ECS vs KO ECS *
Fos (F, qRT PCR) Sig effect of treatment F (1, 14) = 8.392, p = 0.0117 WT vs WT ECS *
Fosb (M, microarray) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 12) = 63.79, p < 0.0001 WT vs WT ECS ****, WT ECS vs KO ECS ****
Fosb (M, qRT PCR) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 12) = 14.01, p = 0.0028 WT vs WT ECS ***, WT ECS vs KO ECS ***
Fosb (F, qRT PCR) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 14) = 7.094, p = 0.0185 WT vs WT ECS ***, WT ECS vs KO ECS **
Junb (M, microarray) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 12) = 18.22, p = 0.0011 WT vs WT ECS ****, KO vs KO ECS *, WT ECS vs KO ECS***
Junb (M, qRT PCR) Sig effect of treatment F (1, 12) = 6.247, p = 0.0280 Posthoc comparisons NS
Junb (F, qRT PCR)

Sig effect of treatment F (1, 14) = 6.569, p = 0.0225; sig

effect of genotype F (1, 14) = 4.608, p = 0.0498

Posthoc comparisons NS
Nr4a2 (M, microarray) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 12) = 15.90, p = 0.0018 WT vs WT ECS ***, WT ECS vs KO ECS ***
Nr4a2 (M, qRT PCR) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 12) = 7.050, p = 0.0210 WT vs WT ECS ***, WT ECS vs KO ECS **
Nr4a2 (F, qRT PCR) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 14) = 5.230, p = 0.0383 WT vs WT ECS *
Mef2c (M, microarray) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 12) = 21.07, p = 0.0006 WT vs WT ECS**, KO vs. WT ECS**
Mef2c (M, qRT PCR) Sig interaction of genotype & treatment F (1, 12) = 9.484, p = 0.0095 Posthoc comparisons NS
Mef2c (F, qRT PCR) Not sig N/A
Calb2 (M, microarray) Sig effect of genotype F (1, 12) = 48.99, p < 0.0001 WT vs KO***, WT ECS vs. KO ECS**
Calb2 (M, qRT PCR) Sig effect of genotype F (1, 12) = 11, p = 0.0061 Posthoc comparisons NS
Calb2 (F, qRT PCR) Not sig N/A