Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 6;200(4):513–522. doi: 10.1007/s00408-022-00551-0

Table 2.

Intra- and postoperative data

Group 1 Group 2 p-value
Patients N 44 43
Type of LTX
 Single N 8 15 0.0927
(%) (18.18) (34.88)
 Bilateral n 36 28
(%) (81.82) (65.12)
Induced immunosuppression n 34 31 0.6281
(%) (77.27) (72.09)
Cardio-circulatory shock n 5 1 0.2024
(%) (11.36) (2.33)
Time (hours) on vasoactive amine therapy Median 64.00 72.00 0.2363
(L95%CI–U95%CI) (50.06–112.4) (41.39–234.6)
Blood transfusions n 21 18 0.6681
(%) (47.73) (41.86)
IMV > 96 ore n 14 17 0.5065
(%) (31.82) (39.53)
Tracheostomy n 10 7 0.5902
(%) (22.73) (16.28)
Time (hours) on NO inhalation therapy Median 48.00 48.00 0.4267
(L95%CI–U95%CI) (39.13–102.9) (39.35–73.96)
Intraoperative ECMO n 11 12 0.8112
(%) (25.00) (27.91)
Postoperative ECMO n 6 2 0.2656
(%) (13.64) (4.65)
PGD grade at 72 h
 Grade 0 n 10 5 0.1198
(%) (22.73) (11.63)
 Grade 1 n 15 11
(%) (34.09) (25.58)
 Grade 2 n 12 11
(%) (27.27) (25.58)
 Grade 3 n 7 16
(%) (15.91) (37.21)
Time (days) in intensive care Median 9.00 9.00 0.5990
(L95%CI–U95%CI) (12.98–23.81) (10.48–22.15)
Time (days) in hospital Median 36.00 37.00 0.4161
(L95%CI–U95%CI) (38.22–54.71) (36.78–48.00)

Patients were divided between those who had no episodes of CMV infection (Group 1) and those who had at least one episode (Group 2)

LTX lung transplant, IMV invasive mechanical ventilation, NO nitric oxide, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, PGD primary graft dysfunction