TABLE 3.
Correlations between the MITI proficiency measures and the practitioners’ self-assessment (i.e., the CEQ-scores) at the three assessment points.
| ITS |
SiS-GS |
|||||
| MITI variable | Baseline n = 57 |
6 month n = 41 |
12 month n = 35 |
Baseline n = 63 |
6 month n = 26 |
12 month n = 27 |
|
| ||||||
| rs (P-value) | rs (P-value) | rs (P-value) | rs (P-value) | rs (P-value) | rs (P-value) | |
| Empathy | 0.00 (0.990) | 0.20 (0.216) | 0.04 (0.830) | –0.01 (0.915) | –0.02 (0.917) | 0.31 (0.115) |
| Evocation | –0.23 (0.102) | 0.00 (0.991) | 0.13 (0.457) | 0.02 (0.905) | 0.36 (0.087) | 0.14 (0.488) |
| Collaboration | –0.30 (0.025) | 0.11 (0.480) | –0.32 (0.065) | 0.04 (0.781) | 0.37 (0.066) | 0.56 (0.003)*** |
| Autonomy Support | –0.13 (0.330) | –0.04 (0.792) | –0.11 (0.521) | 0.08 (0.541) | 0.28 (0.074) | 0.08 (0.690) |
| Direction | 0.14 (0.341) | 0.01 (0.934) | 0.06 (0.727) | 0.26 (0.061) | 0.23 (0.293) | 0.44 (0.024) |
| Reflection to questions | 0.22 (0.108) | 0.00 (0.990) | 0.24 (0.164) | 0.34 (0.006) | 0.37 (0.064) | 0.70 (< 0.001)* |
| % Complex reflections | 0.13 (0.320) | –0.02 (0.882) | –0.14 (0.416) | 0.09 (0.470) | 0.53 (0.006)* | 0.09 (0.663) |
| % Open questions | –0.06 (0.683) | 0.28 (0.074) | 0.29 (0.097) | 0.02 (0.069) | 0.35 (0.083) | 0.35 (0.071) |
| % MI-adherent | –0.03 (0.830) | 0.12 (0.455) | –0.02 (0.899) | 0.33 (0.009)* | 0.05 (0.823) | 0.16 (0.420) |
MITI, the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Code; CEQ, the Clinical Experience Questionnaire; ITS, the individual telephone supervision group; SiS-GS, the SiS group supervision group; rs, Spearman correlation coefficient. */***The two groups correlations differed significantly at the 0.05 (*) or at the 0.001 (***) level at this time point on these MITI proficiency measures.