Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 9.
Published in final edited form as: Attach Hum Dev. 2021 Oct 7;24(3):339–352. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2021.1976934

Table 2.

Indirect effects of neighborhood poverty at ages 11 to 18 on changes of cellular aging from age 20 to 27 through allostatic load at ages 19 and 20, moderated by attachment at ages 25-27

Allostatic Load (ages 19&20) Changes in Cellular Aging (from age 20 - 27) Changes in Cellular Aging (from age 20 - 27)
Predictors b [95% CI] b [95% CI] b [95% CI]
1. Gender, male 0.239 [−0.007, 0.491] −0.314 [−0.826, 0.266] −0.347 [−0.849, 0.201]
2. Family poverty (ages 11-18) 0.050 [−0.011, 0.107]   0.091 [−0.046, 0.243]   0.095 [−0.046, 0.252]
3. Neighborhood poverty (ages 11-18) 1.565*   [0.036, 3.094] −1.950 [−5.200, 1.858] −1.840 [−5.264, 1.991]
4. Allostatic load (AL, ages 19 and 20) -  -   0.282*   [0.019, 0.502]   0.264*   [0.007, 0.497]
5. Attachment avoidance (ages 25 and 27) -  -   0.118 [−0.136, 0.382]   0.116 [−0.133, 0.378]
6. Attachment anxiety (ages 25 and 27) -  - −0.114 [−0.333, 0.096] −0.148 [−0.430, 0.115]
7. AL × Attachment avoidance -  -   0.241*   [0.010, 0.472]  -   -
8. AL × Attachment anxiety -  -  -   -   0.033 [−0.219, 0.301]

N = 271; b = unstandardized regression coefficient; CI = confidence interval.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.