Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 2;21(8):1829–1841. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00020

Table 1. Summary of the Evaluation of PPI-Affinity and State-of-the-Art BA Predictors on Two Sets of Protein–Protein Affinity Dataa.

  test set 1
test set 2
method R MAE (kcal/mol) R MAE (kcal/mol)
PRODIGY 0.74 1.4 0.31 2.5
DFIRE 0.60 4.6 0.10 25.4
CP_PIE –0.52 8.8 –0.10 11.0
ISLAND 0.38 2.1 0.27 2.2
PPI-Affinity 0.62 1.8 0.50 1.8
a

The performance is expressed as the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R) between experimental and predicted BA. The test set 1 corresponds to the benchmark employed by Vangone and Bonvin,21 while the test set 2 corresponds to the hold-out set of 90 data points taken from PDBbind (v.2020). The performance for the other methods on test set 1 was reported by Vangone and Bonvin.21 The negative values of the correlation coefficients indicate that the corresponding method predicts unbinding free energy.