Table 1. Summary of the Evaluation of PPI-Affinity and State-of-the-Art BA Predictors on Two Sets of Protein–Protein Affinity Dataa.
test
set 1 |
test
set 2 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
method | R | MAE (kcal/mol) | R | MAE (kcal/mol) |
PRODIGY | 0.74 | 1.4 | 0.31 | 2.5 |
DFIRE | 0.60 | 4.6 | 0.10 | 25.4 |
CP_PIE | –0.52 | 8.8 | –0.10 | 11.0 |
ISLAND | 0.38 | 2.1 | 0.27 | 2.2 |
PPI-Affinity | 0.62 | 1.8 | 0.50 | 1.8 |
The performance is expressed as the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R) between experimental and predicted BA. The test set 1 corresponds to the benchmark employed by Vangone and Bonvin,21 while the test set 2 corresponds to the hold-out set of 90 data points taken from PDBbind (v.2020). The performance for the other methods on test set 1 was reported by Vangone and Bonvin.21 The negative values of the correlation coefficients indicate that the corresponding method predicts unbinding free energy.