Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 2;21(8):1829–1841. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00020

Table 4. Ranking of BA of Protein–Peptide Interactions in HTRA3 as Predicted by PPI-Affinity and Based on the Experimental IC50 Values.

PPI-Affinity
experimental
ranking ΔG (kcal/mol) ranking (IC50 (μM))a
(1) FGAWVc –7.7 (1) FGRWV 0.6 ± 0.1
(2) FGRWVb –7.5 (2) RSWWV 0.6 ± 0.1
(3) FGRWIc –7.5 (3) FGAWVb 0.9 ± 0.1
(4) RSWWV –7.4 (4) FGRWIb 1.0 ± 0.1
(5) FGRWFc –7.3 (5) GRWV 1.0 ± 0.1
(6) GRWVb –7.2 (6) FARWVb 1.1 ± 0.2
(7) FGRWAb –7.1 (7) RWV 1.3 ± 0.1
(8) FGRAVb –6.9 (8) FGRWL 2.9 ± 0.3
(9) FGRWLb –6.6 (9) FGRWA 3.5 ± 0.3
(10) WVc –6.6 (10) WVb 4.7 ± 0.4
(11) WAc –6.5 (11) FGRWFb 7.7 ± 0.8
(12) FARWVc –6.4 (12) WAb 14 ± 1
(13) WGc –6.2 (13) WGb 22 ± 3
(14) RWVb –5.2 (14) FGRAV 270 ± 110
a

Values from ref (72).

b

Protein–peptide structures are at the border of the applicability domain of PPI-Affinity.

c

Protein–peptide structures that are outside the applicability domain of PPI-Affinity.