Table 3.
Difference between LC and EMMA, patients who adhered ≥ 75% to patient education and physical exercise
| Crude (N = 453) | Adjusted4 (N = 453) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||
| Patient education and physical exercise ≥ 75%1 | LC | 3.42 | 1.63;7.18 | 3.62 | 1.56;8.40 |
| EMMA | 1 (ref) | – | 1 (ref) | – | |
| Patient education ≥ 75%2 | LC | 3.04 | 0.99;9.31 | 3.33 | 1.01;10.95 |
| EMMA | 1 (ref) | – | 1 (ref) | – | |
| Physical exercise ≥ 75%3 | LC | 2.68 | 1.42;5.06 | 2.89 | 1.44;5.77 |
| EMMA | 1 (ref) | – | 1 (ref) | – | |
1 ≥ 75% of provided patient education and physical exercise LC 63.1% (n = 168) EMMA 38.3% (n = 95)
2 ≥ 75% of provided patient education sessions LC 59.7% (n = 159) EMMA 37.5% (n = 93)
3 ≥ 75% of provided physical exercise sessions LC 68.7% (n = 183) EMMA 51.6% (n = 128).
4 Adjusted for sex, age, socioeconomic status (living alone, level of education and employed), comorbidities—using Charlson Comorbidity Index, smoking status and level of depression and anxiety (HADS—baseline)