Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 9;15:80. doi: 10.1186/s13068-022-02178-y

Table 2.

Enzyme numbers and cofactor equivalents for isobutyraldehyde production from C1 feedstocks

Substrate C1-Pathway Intermediate Enzyme number ATP cost NAD(P)H equivalents Refs.
CO2 WLP acetyl-CoA 12 2 11 [47]
CO2 rGlyP pyruvate 11 4 11 [42, 48]
CO2 rTCA cycle acetyl-CoA 13 4 11 [49, 50]

CO2

HCO3

DC/HB cycle acetyl-CoA 18 6 11 [51]
CO2 HCO3 HP/HB cycle acetyl-CoA 20 8 11 [52, 53]
HCO3 3-HP bicycle pyruvate 22 10 11 [54, 55]
CO2 CBB cycle GAP 21a 14a 11a [56]
CO2 ASAP pyruvate 13a − 2a 11a [13]

All calculations are based on converting CO2 equivalents to isobutyraldehyde via pyruvate. NAD(P)H equivalents refer to the reducing power generated from NADH, NADPH, ferredoxin, H2, or H2O.

WLP: Wood–Ljungdahl pathway, rGlyP: reductive glycine pathway, rTCA cycle: reductive TCA cycle, DC/HB cycle: dicarboxylate/4-hydroxybutyrate cycle, HP/HB cycle: 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate cycle, 3-HP bicycle: 3-hydroxypropionate bicycle, CBB cycle: Calvin–Benson–Bassham cycle, ASAP: artificial starch anabolic pathway.

aHere, we assume that the CBB cycle and ASAP are employed to convert CO2 to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (GAP), then a few steps of the glycolysis pathway are utilized to convert GAP to pyruvate, which will be further used to produce isobutyraldehyde