Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 9.
Published in final edited form as: Biotechniques. 2022 Jun 17;73(1):34–46. doi: 10.2144/btn-2022-0032

Table 1.

Limits of detection of microbial cells across extraction kits.

Round Extraction kit Threshold (%) 16S ITS
LOD Read depth Samples retained Samples retained (%) LOD Read depth Samples retained Samples retained (%)
1 PowerSoil 50 1.40E+03 73 81 86 2.66E+00 3 94 100
80 1.40E+05 449 55 59 2.66E+02 223 45 48
90 1.40E+05 1812 43 46 >2.66E+07 199,755 0 0
95 1.40E+08 8676 39 41 >2.66E+07 165,759,100,584 0 0
PowerSoil Pro 50 1.40E+02 46 79 84 2.66E+01 49 70 80
80 1.40E+02 692 61 65 2.66E+04 1094 39 45
90 1.40E+06 7520 33 35 2.66E+05 18,669 14 16
95 >1.40E+09 145,206 0 0 >2.66E+07 698,158 0 0
Norgen Stool 50 1.40E+07 1960 18 19 2.66E+00 2 88 100
80 1.40E+07 4705 12 13 2.66E+05 850 7 8
90 1.40E+08 8224 10 10 >2.66E+07 314,049,798 0 0
95 1.40E+08 14,215 9 10 >2.66E+07 >1.00E+12 0 0
2 PowerSoil 50 1.40E+02 88 93 97 2.66E+00 3 91 100
80 1.40E+02 3224 80 83 2.66E+00 6 91 100
90 >1.40E+09 88,894 0 0 2.66E+00 12 86 95
95 >1.40E+09 6,228,705 0 0 2.66E+00 24 75 82
MagMAX Microbiome 50 1.40E+03 1286 79 82 2.66E+00 5 92 100
80 1.40E+04 4147 66 69 2.66E+00 479 64 70
90 1.40E+04 8970 63 66 >2.66E+07 451,442 0 0
95 1.40E+04 19,454 39 41 >2.66E+07 176,467,642,943 0 0
NucleoMag Food 50 1.40E+05 8379 61 64 2.66E+00 1 88 100
80 1.40E+05 14,121 45 47 2.66E+00 2 88 100
90 1.40E+06 19,430 27 28 2.66E+02 74 69 78
95 1.40E+07 26,321 18 19 >2.66E+07 26,901,301 0 0
Zymo MagBead 50 1.40E+02 489 42 44 2.66E+00 1 90 100
80 1.40E+02 1838 32 33 2.66E+00 4 90 100
90 1.40E+06 4531 22 23 2.66E+01 466 38 42
95 1.40E+06 11,445 10 10 >2.66E+07 5,179,906,841 0 0

Titrations of a mock community containing known numbers of cells of bacterial and fungal species (see Materials & Methods) were used to identify the number of per-sample reads needed to meet certain LOD thresholds (i.e., the percentage of reads mapped to expected taxa vs contaminants). For each dataset, the read depth corresponding to a threshold of 50% was used for filtering samples before community analyses, as recommended [29,33]. The number and percentage of samples retained after filtering based on the read depth for each threshold and LOD estimates for bacterial and fungal cells are shown for 16S- and fungal ITS data, respectively. Rounds 1 and 2 indicate different sequencing runs; because sampling effort was not normalized such to compare absolute read counts, comparisons should not be made across sequencing runs.

ITS: Internal transcribed spacer; LOD: Limits of detection.