Table 2.
Data type | Distance metric | Factor | Adjusted R2 | df | AIC | F | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16S | Unweighted UniFrac | Host identity | 0.93 | 60 | −979.83 | 152.03 | 0.0002 |
Unweighted UniFrac | Extraction kit | 0.001 | 6 | −988.95 | 3.2 | 0.0004 | |
Weighted UniFrac | Host identity | 0.84 | 60 | −428.1 | 58.62 | 0.0002 | |
Weighted UniFrac | Extraction kit | 0.02 | 6 | −533.75 | 19.27 | 0.0002 | |
Jaccard | Host identity | 0.96 | 60 | −1234.51 | 231.05 | 0.0002 | |
Jaccard | Extraction kit | 0.002 | 6 | −1254.66 | 4.92 | 0.0002 | |
RPCA | Host identity | 0.89 | 60 | −644.89 | 86.15 | 0.0002 | |
RPCA | Extraction kit | 0.004 | 6 | −663.81 | 4.73 | 0.0002 | |
ITS | Jaccard | Host identity | 0.8 | 59 | −191.58 | 33.9 | 0.0002 |
Jaccard | Extraction kit | 0.02 | 6 | −235.28 | 8.51 | 0.0002 | |
RPCA | Host identity | 0.72 | 59 | −30.05 | 22.32 | 0.0002 | |
RPCA | Extraction kit | 0.02 | 6 | −62.07 | 6.64 | 0.0002 | |
Metagenomic | Unweighted UniFrac | Host identity | 0.92 | 65 | −1063.58 | 141.03 | 0.0002 |
Unweighted UniFrac | Extraction kit | 0.005 | 6 | −1107.59 | 8.79 | 0.0002 | |
Weighted UniFrac | Host identity | 0.87 | 65 | −672.15 | 81.26 | 0.0002 | |
Weighted UniFrac | Extraction kit | 0.02 | 6 | −807.08 | 24.46 | 0.0002 | |
Jaccard | Host identity | 0.93 | 65 | −1195 | 168.79 | 0.0002 | |
Jaccard | Extraction kit | 0.003 | 6 | −1225.27 | 6.57 | 0.0002 | |
RPCA | Host identity | 0.85 | 65 | −579.25 | 70.95 | 0.0002 | |
RPCA | Extraction kit | 0.01 | 6 | −633.1 | 10.4 | 0.0002 |
Results are from forward, stepwise model selection, following Shaffer et al. (2021) [33]. Values are based on permutation tests of variation explained by redundancy analysis (n = 5000 runs), done separately for unique distance metrics for 16S, the fungal ITS, and shotgun metagenomic data. The full model included extraction round (i.e., Round 1 vs 2), sample biomass (i.e., high vs low biomass), sample type, host subject identity and extraction kit as model variables. 16S data were rarefied to 10,000 quality-filtered reads per sample or had samples with fewer than 10,000 reads excluded when using RPCA distances (n = 640 samples). Fungal ITS data were rarefied to 630 quality-filtered reads per sample or had samples with fewer than 630 reads excluded when using RPCA distances (n = 978 samples). Shotgun metagenomic data were rarefied to 2100 host- and quality-filtered reads per sample or had samples with fewer than 2100 reads excluded when using RPCA distances (n = 1044 samples). Rarefaction depths were selected to maintain at least 75% samples (50% for fungal ITS data) from both high- and low-biomass datasets.
AIC: Akaike information criterion; df: degrees of freedom; ITS: Internal transcribed spacer; RPCA: Robust principal components analysis (i.e., Robust Aitchison distance).