Armstrong 1997.
Methods | Phase 1: trial dose 25 mcg baclofen to determine whether beneficial and whether excessive sedation produced. A further trial with 10 mcg dose performed if the patient sedated with 25 mcg dose. If evidence of benefit without significant side effects, patients proceeded to next phase Phase 2: double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of baclofen or saline Phase 3: code broken, pump implantation in individuals who benefited, open‐label, long‐term infusion of intrathecal baclofen |
|
Participants | 19 children with spasticity, of whom 10 had spastic cerebral palsy | |
Interventions | Subarachnoid catheter with subcutaneous access port; escalating dose of intrathecal baclofen (dose and bolus versus continuous infusion not specified), or intrathecal saline | |
Outcomes | Ashworth score upper and lower limbs | |
Notes | Ashworth score results of randomised phase not reported. Author unable to supply this data. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation or methods relating to this not described. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No relevant detail recorded. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No relevant detail recorded. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No relevant detail recorded. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) | Low risk | Study described as "double blind." |
Potential for carry‐over effect in cross‐over study design | Low risk | Washout period of at least two to four days |