Table 2.
Quantitative results on different SOD datasets
| ECSSD [54] | HKU-IS [25] | DUT-OMRON [35] | DUT-TE [47] | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | model | Eφ ↑ | Sα ↑ | ↑ | M ↓ | Eφ ↑ | Sα ↑ | ↑ | M ↓ | Eφ ↑ | Sα ↑ | ↑ | M ↓ | Eφ ↑ | Sα ↑ | ↑ | M ↓ |
| 1 | BAN [39] |
|
0.924 | 0.923 | 0.035 | 0.950 | 0.913 | 0.900 | 0.032 | 0.892 | 0.879 | 0.815 | 0.040 | 0.860 | 0.832 | 0.746 | 0.059 |
| 2 | CPD [51] | 0.925 | 0.918 | 0.917 | 0.037 | 0.944 | 0.905 | 0.891 | 0.034 | 0.887 | 0.869 | 0.805 | 0.043 | 0.866 | 0.825 | 0.747 | 0.056 |
| 3 | EGNet [64] |
|
|
0.920 | 0.037 | 0.948 | 0.916 | 0.898 | 0.032 | 0.891 |
|
0.815 | 0.039 | 0.867 |
|
|
|
| 4 | SCRN [10] | 0.926 |
|
0.918 | 0.037 | 0.949 | 0.916 | 0.896 | 0.034 | 0.888 | 0.885 | 0.809 | 0.040 | 0.863 | 0.837 | 0.746 | 0.056 |
| 5 | F3Net [48] |
|
0.924 |
|
|
|
0.917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.838 | 0.766 | 0.053 |
| 6 | MINet [37] |
|
|
0.924 |
|
|
|
0.909 |
|
0.898 | 0.884 | 0.828 |
|
0.865 | 0.833 | 0.755 | 0.056 |
| 7 | ITSD [68] |
|
|
0.895 |
|
|
0.917 | 0.899 | 0.031 | 0.895 | 0.885 | 0.804 | 0.041 | 0.863 | 0.840 |
|
0.061 |
| 8 | Ours | 0.924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.886 |
|
0.038 |
|
|
|
|
The best two results are highlighted in
and
respectively. The training set is DUTS-TR [47] for all the methods