Pan 2017.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: Randomised controlled trial Study grouping: Parallel group Country: Taiwan Setting: Intervention conducted in households; outcomes measured at 8 clinical centres Aim of study: To evaluate the effects of potassium‐ and magnesium‐enriched salts on the neurologic performance of stroke patients Unit of allocation: Adults (age 45 years and older) Start date: December 2009 End date: May 2013 Relevant study limitations as reported by study authors: Lack of statistical power due to small sample size; synergistic effects of magnesium and potassium may be present; large dropout rate; under‐consumption of intervention salt and collection of first morning urine samples (instead of 24‐hour urine samples) Sample size calculation: NR |
|
Participants |
Baseline Characteristics LSSS intervention (≥ 30% KCl)
LSSS intervention (≥ 30% KCl)
Control
Inclusion criteria: Adults, aged 45 years and older, who were hospitalised for <= 1 month because of cerebral infarction or haemorrhage, with a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of <= 4 at the time of discharge, who agreed to prepare foods with salt provided by the study Exclusion criteria: Patients with poor kidney function (GFR < 60 mL/min), secondary hypertension, cancer, or liver diseases, those with eating disorders; those taking potassium‐sparing medicines, or consuming salt substitutes Pretreatment: None reported at baseline. However, the proportion of participants with hypertension in the control group (50.5%) was lower compared to the intervention groups, especially the < 50% KCl group (68.4%). Method of recruitment of participants: Medical practitioners at 8 participating hospitals identified potentially eligible patients. Informed consent obtained: yes (written) Clusters: n/a Subgroups planned/measured: NR Subgroups reported: NR Participant flow Assessed for eligibility: NR Excluded (number with reasons): NR Randomised: n = 291 Allocated to LSSS intervention/s: n = 97 (LSSS 50% KCl); n = 95 (LSSS < 50% KCl) Allocated to control: n = 99 Received allocated LSSS intervention/s: NR Did not receive allocated LSSS intervention/s: NR Lost to follow‐up (LSSS intervention group): At 3 months: n = 21 (LSSS 50% KCl) ‐ Reasons: Moved away (n = 2), hospital transfer (n = 1), left study (n = 15), lost to follow‐up (n = 3)n = 20; (LSSS < 50% KCl)‐ Reasons: Suicidal death (n = 1), hospital transfer (n = 2), left study (n = 16), lost to follow‐up (n = 1) At 6 months: n = 14 (LSSS 50% KCl)‐ Reasons: Hospital transfer (n = 3), left study (n = 9), lost to follow‐up (n = 2) n = 11; (LSSS < 50% KCl) ‐ Reasons: Hospital transfer (n = 1), left study (n = 8), lost to follow‐up (n = 2) Discontinued intervention (LSSS intervention group): At 3 months: n = 15 (LSSS 50% KCl) n = 16 (LSSS < 50% KCl) At 6 months: n = 9 (LSSS 50% KCl) n = 8 (LSSS < 50% KCl) Analysed (LSSS intervention group): n = 97 (LSSS 50% KCl); n = 95 (LSSS < 50% KCl) ‐ ITT analysis was performed (the last‐observation‐carried‐forward method) Excluded from analysis (LSSS intervention group): NR Received allocated control: NR Did not receive allocated control: NR Lost to follow‐up (control group): At 3 months: n = 15 Reasons ‐ Suicidal death (n = 1), hospital transfer (n = 1), left study (n = 12), lost to follow‐up (n = 1) At 6 months: n = 13 Reasons ‐ Hospital transfer (n = 1), left study (n = 10), lost to follow‐up (n = 2) Discontinued intervention (control group): At 3 months: n = 12 At 6 months: n = 10 Analysed (control group): n = 99 ‐ ITT analysis was performed (the last‐observation‐carried‐forward method) Excluded from analysis (control group): NR |
|
Interventions |
Intervention Characteristics LSSS intervention (50% KCl)
LSSS intervention (< 50% KCl)
Control
|
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcomes:
Secondary outcomes
|
|
Notes |
Funding source: Supported by grants from the Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, and from the Ministry of Health and Welfare (DOH098‐TD‐F‐113‐098030). Authors name: Wen‐Harn Pan Institution: Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan Email: pan@ibms.sinica.edu.tw Possible conflicts of interest (for study authors): None. Sources used for data extraction: Journal article with results of the trial Trial registration details: NCT02910427 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computerised block randomisation sequence generation. A stratified randomisation method was used according to a clinical history of ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, diabetes or no diabetes, and the use of magnesium‐containing medication or not. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Salts were labelled by numbers 1, 2, 3 during manufacturing. Allocation was performed by software once the participant's details were entered. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The study authors reported that participants and personnel, such as the medical practitioners involved in the salt distribution, were blinded. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The medical practitioners performing the patient evaluations were blinded. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Incomplete data reported at 6 months were 34% (33/97)(LSSS 50% KCl) and 34.7% (33/95) (LSSS < 50% KCl), compared to 28.3% (28/99) in the control group. The study authors stated that no significant difference was found in baseline characteristics between participants who remained in the study at month 3 and at month 6, compared to those who did not. The study authors conducted an ITT analysis (last‐observation‐carried‐forward). |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Primary outcomes reported according to those pre‐specified in the study protocol (NCT02910427) |
Other bias | Low risk | None identified |
Overall risk of bias | Low risk | Low risk of bias for allocation concealment and incomplete outcome data |