Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 12;35(4):573–585. doi: 10.1007/s10334-022-01003-9

Table 4.

Mean prostate pseudo-T2 with standard deviation after all three versions of AutoRef normalization

Scanner Pseudo-T2 (ms) Failed muscle Failed fat Failed femoral head Failed pelvic bone Number of patients
AutoRefF AutoRefFH AutoRefPB
St. Olavs Skyra 84.7 ± 7.7 (3) 88.0 ± 8.1 (0) 72.3 ± 7.2 (0) 0 3 0 0 319
Prostate X Skyra 81.6 ± 7.0 (1) 84.5 ± 7.5 (1) 70.7 ± 6.3 (0) 0 1 1 0 276
Prostate X TrioTim 84.1 ± 7.8 (1) 89.5 ± 7.3 (0) 73.2 ± 7.3 (0) 0 1 0 0 47
St. Olavs Biograph mMR 80.0 ± 7.4 (0) 81.2 ± 6.6 (0) 67.1 ± 5.3 (0) 0 0 0 0 28
CGMH Discovery MR750 87.3 ± 6.7 (10) 92.8 ± 7.3 (3) 72.1 ± 5.2 (1) 1 10 2 0 278
CGMH Ingenia 78.7 ± 7.3 (0) 84.5 ± 8.6 (0) 72.9 ± 8.2 (0) 0 0 0 0 10
CGMH Optima MR450w 75.0 ± 6.4 (16) 78.2 ± 7.0 (22) 66.4 ± 6.3 (16) 16 2 15 0 179
CGMH Biograph mMR 72.0 ± 5.0 (0) 75.0 ± 4.7 (0) 62.7 ± 5.1 (0) 0 0 0 0 8
CGMH TrioTim 83.0 ± 6.7 (1) 88.1 ± 7.7 (0) 71.8 ± 6.7 (0) 0 1 0 0 23
CGMH Skyra 82.5 ± 7.6 (0) 86.0 ± 7.5 (0) 71.5 ± 7.1 (0) 0 0 0 0 18
Entire dataset 82.8 ± 8.1 (32) 86.7 ± 8.9 (26) 70.9 ± 6.7 (17) 17 18 18 0 1186

The number of patients where normalization failed due to lack of either reference tissue is reported in parenthesis