Skip to main content
. 2022 May 2;279(9):4577–4586. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07401-y

Table 3.

Univariable Cox regression analyses for the volumes of interest of TLG

Overall survival Disease-free survival
HR (95% CI)ª p-value C-index HR (95% CI)ª p-value C-index
T TLG with SUV2.5 threshold 1.001 (10,004–1.003) 0.009 0.652 1.003 (1.001–1.004) 0.001 0.693
N TLG with SUV2.5 threshold 1.002 (1.001–1.003) 0.005 0.586 1.001 (1.001–1.002) 0.014 0.586
T + N with TLG SUV2.5 threshold 1.001 (1.001–1.002) 0.001 0.660 1.001 (1.001–1.002)  < 0.001 0.706
T TLG with background-level threshold 1.001 (1.01–1.001) 0.281 0.629 1.001 (1.01–1.001) 0.245 0.671
N TLG with background-level threshold 1.002 (1.001–1.003) 0.006 0.545 1.001 (1.001–1.002) 0.020 0.566
T + N TLG with background-level threshold 1.001 (1.001–1.002) 0.001 0.649 1.001 (1.001–1.002)  < 0.001 0.694

ªPer unit increment

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, TLG total lesion glycolysis, C-index Harrell’s C-index, SUV standardized uptake value, T tumor, N lymph node