TABLE 3.

Correlations between results from different procedures averaged across conditions.

	FDT	F0DT	TC	RC	II	MSI
DT	0.52*	0.55*	0.41	0.59**	0.46*	0.52*
FDT		0.94***	0.81***	0.82***	0.92***	0.72***
F0DT			0.88***	0.88***	0.93***	0.73***
TC				0.90***	0.86***	0.75***
RC					0.82***	0.70***
II						0.75***

For clarity, only the correlation magnitudes are displayed, but all comparisons were congruent in that better performance on one measure corresponded with better performance on another. Correlation coefficients and p-values associated with p-values less than 0.05 are emboldened. DT, detection thresholds; FDT, frequency discrimination thresholds; F0DT, fundamental frequency discrimination thresholds; TC, tonal comparisons; RC, rhythm comparisons; II, interval identification; MSI, musical sophistication index; p=0.05 (*), p=0.01 (**), p=0.0024 (^x) and p=0.001 (***). Note that only the correlations with p=0.0024 (^x) or p=0.001 (***) were statistically significant for the stringent Bonferroni-adjusted criteria which adjusts alpha from 0.05 to 0.05/21 or 0.0024.