Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr-Jun;23(2):84–92. doi: 10.18502/jri.v23i2.8992

Table 4.

Comparison of semen analysis indices and testicular volume between patients with clinical (ultrasonographic grades 3–5) and subclinical (ultrasonographic grades 1–2) varicoceles

Varicocele status N Mean SD p-value
Semen analysis
  Sperm count (×106 cells/ml) Subclinical 19 68.48 49.48 0.200
Clinical 90 54.20 47.43
  Semen volume (ml) Subclinical 19 3.49 2.00 0.211
Clinical 89 4.48 6.28
  Morphology (% normal) Subclinical 19 45.89 14.57 0.753
Clinical 89 45.52 16.61
  Grade 4 motility (%) Subclinical 19 38.94 21.76 0.239
Clinical 90 32.27 22.90
  Grade 3 motility (%) Subclinical 18 4.44 8.38 0.236
Clinical 90 8.57 14.87
  Progressive motility (%) Subclinical 19 43.15 18.72 0.650
Clinical 90 40.84 20.47
  Grade 2 motility (%) Subclinical 19 6.73 4.72 0.058
Clinical 90 4.75 4.25
  Grade 1 motility (%) Subclinical 19 8.94 16.18 0.389
Clinical 90 4.90 2.748
  Grade 0 motility (%) Subclinical 19 43.78 19.60 0.384
Clinical 90 48.86 19.66
Testicular volume (ml)
  Left * Subclinical 19 19.47 5.21 0.700
Clinical 90 18.95 5.41
  Right Subclinical 19 21.16 6.160 0.820
Clinical 90 20.19 5.74
*

Independent t-test (Mann-Whitney U test was used in all other cases)