Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 5;13(3):19476035221114242. doi: 10.1177/19476035221114242

Table 6.

Comparison of T2 Mapping Compositional MRI Outcomes Between the AR and PM Groups at Final Follow-Up.

Superficial Layer Deep Layer
Group AR (n = 17) Group PM (n = 11) P Value Group AR (n = 17) Group PM(n = 11) P Value
MFC-1 38.71 ± 13.73 41.57 ± 16.94 0.628 23.78 ± 9.83 25.81 ± 11.82 0.627
MFC-2 44.01 ± 9.98 44.15 ± 18.71 0.980 21.74 ± 7.48 22.30 ± 6.30 0.838
MFC-3 44.10 ± 8.47 56.93 ± 16.51 0.033 a 13.66 ± 3.02 15.48 ± 6.22 0.308
MFC-4 45.10 ± 10.00 51.05 ± 15.36 0.224 15.19 ± 3.82 17.15 ± 5.04 0.253
MFC-5 48.21 ± 9.57 52.75 ± 9.23 0.225 18.92 ± 5.81 21.26 ± 5.28 0.291
MT-1 29.68 ± 10.12 36.49 ± 15.49 0.170 16.85 ± 6.83 14.81 ± 3.38 0.305
MT-2 32.87 ± 6.99 44.71 ± 11.91 0.010 a 12.00 ± 2.70 11.65 ± 1.79 0.708
MT-3 40.67 ± 5.77 51.26 ± 17.29 0.074 16.59 ± 6.06 14.78 ± 3.26 0.373

Values are expressed as mean ± SD.

AR = all-inside repair; PM = partial meniscectomy; MFC = medial femur condyle; MT = medial tibia.

a

Significant at the level of P < 0.05.