Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 9;17:43. doi: 10.1186/s13722-022-00321-6

Table 5.

Post-hoc results from Wilcoxon signed-rank tests on nurse practitioner and physician assistant perceived efficacy of buprenorphine (BUP), methadone (MET), and naltrexone (NTX)

Perceived efficacy Comparison Ties Positive ranks Negative ranks Effect size Z Pa
n Sum of ranks n Sum of ranks
Decreases risk of death from an opioid overdose MET vs NTX 88 24 2796 48 6168 − 0.25 − 3.16 0.002
BUP vs NTX 112 28 3634.5 9 1212.5 0.25 3.03 0.003
BUP vs MET 110 56 7987 7 959 0.47 6.20  < 0.001
Decreases cravings for opioids MET vs NTX 103 36 4813 23 3034 0.14 1.73 0.088
BUP vs NTX 104 40 5052.5 5 662.5 0.42 5.14  < 0.001
BUP vs MET 135 34 5231 3 467 0.39 5.08  < 0.001
Decreases rates of relapse MET vs NTX 98 27 3370.5 36 4819.5 − 0.11 − 1.40 0.156
BUP vs NTX 103 30 3699 12 1530 0.22 2.68 0.008
BUP vs MET 107 51 7031.5 10 1386.5 0.40 5.21  < 0.001
Works well in clients with co- occurring mental health disorders MET vs NTX 92 27 3307.5 41 5294.5 − 0.15 − 1.90 0.058
BUP vs NTX 101 34 4164.5 11 1415.5 0.27 3.30 0.001
BUP vs MET 108 53 7349 7 961 0.46 5.93  < 0.001
Should be supplemented by mental health counseling MET vs NTX 135 19 2831 8 1192 0.17 2.12 0.052
BUP vs NTX 116 17 2167.5 7 916.5 0.17 1.99 0.064
BUP vs MET 144 13 1989 6 937 0.12 1.57 0.167
Should be supplemented by participation in peer support groups MET vs NTX 132 20 2955 10 1470 0.14 1.84 0.080
BUP vs NTX 120 19 2530.5 7 940.5 0.19 2.34 0.028
BUP vs MET 149 13 2067 7 1123 0.10 1.32 0.263
Efficacy is improved by adding mental health counseling MET vs NTX 135 19 2805 5 735 0.23 2.86 0.006
BUP vs NTX 125 19 2584 4 567 0.25 3.07 0.003
BUP vs MET 150 13 2077 7 1133 0.10 1.32 0.259
Appropriate for unstable patients MET vs NTX 72 26 3069 63 7344 − 0.30 − 3.81  < 0.001
BUP vs NTX 69 32 3382 41 4356 − 0.09 − 1.06 0.300
BUP vs MET 97 46 6071 20 2542 0.26 3.31 0.001
Often diverted or misused MET vs NTX 55 95 10,136 7 727 0.68 8.51  < 0.001
BUP vs NTX 61 78 8677.5 17 1677.5 0.52 6.44  < 0.001
BUP vs MET 82 34 4328 66 8922 − 0.25 − 3.42 0.001

aHolm-Bonferroni method adjusted p-values for 27 comparisons

Bold values indicate a test is significant once the corrected p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05