Table 7.
Coupling degree between competitive sports system and economic and social development.
| Province | The degree of coupling value | Coupling type |
|---|---|---|
| Beijing | 0.983 | I |
| Jiangsu | 0.942 | I |
| Guangdong | 0.901 | I |
| Shanghai | 0.858 | I |
| Liaoning | 0.798 | II |
| Zhejiang | 0.795 | II |
| Fujian | 0.778 | II |
| Shandong | 0.732 | II |
| Hubei | 0.729 | II |
| Sichuan | 0.621 | II |
| Shaanxi | 0.608 | II |
| Tianjin | 0.598 | II |
| Hebei | 0.485 | III |
| Hunan | 0.463 | III |
| Inner Mongolia | 0.397 | III |
| Jilin | 0.368 | III |
| Heilongjiang | 0.342 | III |
| Shanxi | 0.292 | IV |
| Anhui | 0.283 | IV |
| Jiangxi | 0.267 | IV |
| Henan | 0.253 | IV |
| Guangxi | 0.251 | IV |
| Chongqing | 0.244 | IV |
| Guizhou | 0.231 | IV |
| Yunnan | 0.205 | IV |
| Tibet | 0.195 | IV |
| Gansu | 0.182 | IV |
| Qinghai | 0.180 | IV |
| Ningxia | 0.164 | IV |
| Xinjiang | 0.159 | IV |
| Hainan | 0.132 | IV |
I: Verge of coupling out of balance; II: Reluctantly coupled coordination; III: Primary coupling coordination; IV: Good coupling coordination.