Table 5.
Model 1: taking the financial wellbeing as independent variables, food insecurity as mediators and PCS-SF12 as the dependent variable. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Direct effect | Indirect effect | |||||
Beta | SE | p-value | Beta | Boot SE | Boot CI | |
Financial wellbeing scale (IFDFW) on PCS-SF12 | −0.14 | 0.26 | 0.575 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.02; 0.36* |
Model 2: taking the financial wellbeing as independent variables, food insecurity as mediators as mediators and MCS-SF12 as the dependent variable. | ||||||
Direct effect | Indirect effect | |||||
Beta | SE | p-value | Beta | Boot SE | Boot CI | |
Financial wellbeing scale (IFDFW) on MCS-SF12 | 1.80 | 0.34 | <0.001 | −0.02 | 0.08 | −0.20; 0.14 |
Indicates significant mediation.