Table 1.
Comparison of the present SARS-COV-2 NP sensor detection with others reported recently.
Entity | Analytical methods | Linear range | Detection limit | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen-printed | Electrochemical sensor | 1 ng/mL to 1000 ng/mL | 0.8 pg/mL | [2] |
Screen-printed | Miniaturized electrochemical immunosensor | 0.01 to 0.6 μg/mL | 8 ng/mL | [5] |
UCNPs@mSiO2 | 5G-enabled fluorescence sensor | 2.2 ng/mL to 200 ng/mL | 2.2 ng/mL | [24] |
Molecularly imprinted polymer | Electrochemical sensor | 2.22–111 fM | 15 fM | [26] |
CRISPR/Cas12a system | Electrochemical aptamer sensor | 50 pg/mL to 100 ng/mL | 16.5 pg/mL | [45] |
Nanodiamond assembled gold interdigitated | Biosensor | 1 fM to 100 pM | 0.389 fM | [46] |
Plasmonic GNP | Biosensor | 150 ng/mL to 650 ng/mL | 150 ng/mL | [47] |
Dual working screen-printed | Electrochemical immunosensor | 1 pg/mL to 10 ng/mL | 116 fg/mL and 150 fg/mL | [48] |
Gold nanoparticle cluster | Colorimetric sensor | 0.3 ng/mL to 1,000 ng/mL | 0.038 ng/mL | [49] |
TiO2@Bi2WO6/Ag2S | PEC | 0.001 ng/mL to 50 ng/mL | 0.38 pg/mL | This work |