Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 11;182:107866. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107866

Table 1.

Comparison of the present SARS-COV-2 NP sensor detection with others reported recently.

Entity Analytical methods Linear range Detection limit Reference
Screen-printed Electrochemical sensor 1 ng/mL to 1000 ng/mL 0.8 pg/mL [2]
Screen-printed Miniaturized electrochemical immunosensor 0.01 to 0.6 μg/mL 8 ng/mL [5]
UCNPs@mSiO2 5G-enabled fluorescence sensor 2.2 ng/mL to 200 ng/mL 2.2 ng/mL [24]
Molecularly imprinted polymer Electrochemical sensor 2.22–111 fM 15 fM [26]
CRISPR/Cas12a system Electrochemical aptamer sensor 50 pg/mL to 100 ng/mL 16.5 pg/mL [45]
Nanodiamond assembled gold interdigitated Biosensor 1 fM to 100 pM 0.389 fM [46]
Plasmonic GNP Biosensor 150 ng/mL to 650 ng/mL 150 ng/mL [47]
Dual working screen-printed Electrochemical immunosensor 1 pg/mL to 10 ng/mL 116 fg/mL and 150 fg/mL [48]
Gold nanoparticle cluster Colorimetric sensor 0.3 ng/mL to 1,000 ng/mL 0.038 ng/mL [49]
TiO2@Bi2WO6/Ag2S PEC 0.001 ng/mL to 50 ng/mL 0.38 pg/mL This work